Seal_Tech
Wee Gulp
Does this remind u of at teacher @ U of D?
Posts: 77
|
Post by Seal_Tech on Oct 30, 2003 11:46:05 GMT -5
SRV still had the skills to dominate over Hendrix. His palying style was just like Hendrix.
|
|
|
|
Post by ♫MysteriousMan♫ on Oct 30, 2003 17:10:19 GMT -5
stop being contradictory. You just said SRV "dominated" Hendrix, and then in the very next sentence said that their playing styles were "just like" each other.
Two things wrong, A. their styles were not really like each other. One was blues, one was rock. B. you mentioned that one was better, then stated how similar they were. Very confusing.
|
|
|
|
Post by GilSchwartzman on Oct 30, 2003 20:30:33 GMT -5
SRV blows. its all about skip james. SRV can sux my butt.
|
|
Seal_Tech
Wee Gulp
Does this remind u of at teacher @ U of D?
Posts: 77
|
Post by Seal_Tech on Oct 30, 2003 20:30:38 GMT -5
If you have ever wayched them play the look on their faces are simmilar and the shit that they could do with the guitar was simmiluar.
|
|
Seal_Tech
Wee Gulp
Does this remind u of at teacher @ U of D?
Posts: 77
|
Post by Seal_Tech on Oct 30, 2003 20:32:15 GMT -5
and just because one was rock and the other one was blues does not have anything to do with their styles of playing the guitar. Ganre has nothing to do with the style of the musitian.
|
|
|
|
Post by ♫MysteriousMan♫ on Oct 30, 2003 20:37:33 GMT -5
type (genre) of music has everything to do with style! Style is the type of music plus the way they play. Stevie had a bluesy/funky style and Hendrix had a rock/funk style. Two separate things. And please type with both hands.
|
|
|
|
Post by William on Nov 1, 2003 0:59:44 GMT -5
what!!! Hendrix was all blues, just rythm and blues, not basic bluses patterns...it was very blues...
|
|
|
|
Post by GilSchwartzman on Nov 1, 2003 22:52:20 GMT -5
eah, just like J5 is ragtime? what the hell. learn how to categorize music, ken. hendrix is definitely rock, psych rock. NOT R&B. why would you even say R&B?
|
|
Seal_Tech
Wee Gulp
Does this remind u of at teacher @ U of D?
Posts: 77
|
Post by Seal_Tech on Nov 2, 2003 23:26:30 GMT -5
I might have to agree with Gil
there is a first time for everything.
|
|
|
|
Post by ♫MysteriousMan♫ on Nov 6, 2003 9:47:32 GMT -5
yeah, holy crap, i do agree too. Hendrix was not blues at all. Trust me.
|
|
|
|
Post by William on Nov 7, 2003 1:44:36 GMT -5
not blues at all??? what??? not straight blues, but the songs...were all basic blues bass...with a little more pace, the guitar kept the pattern, just some psychedelic rock...i mean not straigh blues, but very much so blues influence, and blues is a strong part of his music...especialy with the band of the gypsies...
|
|
|
|
Post by ♫MysteriousMan♫ on Nov 8, 2003 20:47:03 GMT -5
well, im not too familiar with him during the Band of Gypsies, but maybe the bass was bluesy during Jimi's other days. But I've listened to a lot of different types of blues, and in my opinion, Jimi was nowhere near blues. I would guess he was that psychodelic rock or whatever, but I am not as experienced in that genre, so to be more general, he was definetly rock.
|
|
Seal_Tech
Wee Gulp
Does this remind u of at teacher @ U of D?
Posts: 77
|
Post by Seal_Tech on Nov 11, 2003 18:00:15 GMT -5
their is no way that you can be serious when u say that Hendrix is Blues. even if u know just a little about music one could tell the difference between roch and Blues.
|
|
|
|
Post by scott on Nov 11, 2003 18:05:23 GMT -5
What is roch?
Some new type of music...
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Mildrid the Nut Schlapper on Nov 11, 2003 18:32:08 GMT -5
Both Clapton and Hendrix are/were great guitar players and writers. I just liked Clapton's music better.
|
|
