|
|
Post by Swanny on Jan 5, 2004 18:45:19 GMT -5
even if you get raped you are technically considered "not a virgin"
but if there was ever a situation of rape, incest, or something like that, i would really think that that girl was a "virgin" if someone can't help it if someone forces them to have sex, i don' think that they should be called a non-virgin. it doesn't seem fair to me. anyway, i would still consider them a virgin.
|
|
Clump
X-Treme Gulp
Stop Buggering Me
Posts: 437
|
Post by Clump on Jan 5, 2004 23:17:19 GMT -5
If they engaged in the act then they are no longer a virgin. I don't see why people put so much stress on a word.
|
|
|
|
Post by lilsis on Jan 5, 2004 23:26:25 GMT -5
i have to agree with swannys last comment, i asked my religion teacher about that once, but he said that they would not be considered a virgin, but i think God will still consider a girl one, if she was forced
|
|
Clump
X-Treme Gulp
Stop Buggering Me
Posts: 437
|
Post by Clump on Jan 5, 2004 23:28:36 GMT -5
I don't think God cares about a word, but what he does care about it that the girl is not culpable for the act.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mark617 on Jan 6, 2004 23:40:15 GMT -5
even if you get raped you are technically considered "not a virgin" but if there was ever a situation of rape, incest, or something like that, i would really think that that girl was a "virgin" if someone can't help it if someone forces them to have sex, i don' think that they should be called a non-virgin. it doesn't seem fair to me. anyway, i would still consider them a virgin. they're not a virigin anymore. but so what, its not that big of a deal. no decent person would hold it against a girl that she's not a virgin anymore if she was raped or something. |
|
|
|
Post by William on Jan 6, 2004 23:44:39 GMT -5
i dont think it matters if shes a virgin, that just disputes the dynamics of the word...
shes still pure...
|
|
|
|
Post by Mark617 on Jan 8, 2004 22:31:29 GMT -5
good point, that about sums it all up |
|
