|
|
Post by William on Nov 15, 2003 16:58:56 GMT -5
ok...that wasnt...spam...it was spam amended to a logical contributing post...very valid...and dont call me satan of jesus...just stop...
|
|
|
|
Post by TheSilentDemon on Nov 17, 2003 22:58:09 GMT -5
would u both quit crying like little babies. listen scott your the one who brought the whole exploitation side into this conversation. now your bringing it out. don't bring something in and then say this is not what the debate is about. and also your always saying that mr. hill is always like if you do this you go to hell. if u mess up here you are wrong. this is bad this is wrong. yet your complying with will here in saying that the moral issues of porn are what makes it wrong. sound just like mr. hill the guy who you are constantly complaining about. i don't know why your so two faced. it seems like you have an opinion for real life and one for the boards. i mean you yourself even had a girls gone wild thing on your computer. so ummm yeh porn is bad but yeh i have it on my computer and i buy maxim and FHM sometimes. if your saying the bad side of porn is the lust then looking at the FHM girls is lustful. and also wrong. so we are all just trying to draw our own simantical lines.
|
|
|
|
Post by scott on Nov 17, 2003 23:06:46 GMT -5
I agreewith Mr.Hill on some things,and not on other things.Did I ever say I have never looked at porn?No.Have I?Yes.Do I look at porn now?No.
Do I feel bad that I have looked at porn in the past?Yes.
Will I ever look at it again?No.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheSilentDemon on Nov 17, 2003 23:16:21 GMT -5
ok well then waht about all the fhm/maxims. and the heavy metal magazine with jenna jameson in it. why do u still hang on to those. i'm not critizing you for having it, like i said i am not against porn, but if you don't want to look at it ever again then why hold on to the stuff you have
|
|
|
|
Post by scott on Nov 17, 2003 23:22:58 GMT -5
I no long have any FHMs or anything like that,and the only reason I got Revolver(heavy metal) is because the Ataris were in it.And I am an Ataris whore.
And I think you can look at Maxim/FHM not with lust.I mean,sure there are a million half naked women but the writing is funny and good,not that anyone would pick that up...
|
|
|
|
Post by TheSilentDemon on Nov 17, 2003 23:30:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by William on Nov 18, 2003 0:28:06 GMT -5
i doubt that, and you can get a magazine for the articles, but you can get a magazine that probably has better articles that isnt playboy or maxim, and further, Scott you are an Atari's Harlot...dont doubt him...
|
|
Clump
X-Treme Gulp
Stop Buggering Me
Posts: 437
|
Post by Clump on Nov 18, 2003 18:33:02 GMT -5
Why do people seem to think that it's impossible to read Playboy for just the articles? You people are sick.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheSilentDemon on Nov 18, 2003 20:53:06 GMT -5
i was being sarcastic will. and yeh thats the whole point of that statement. when someone says yeh i just read it for the articles then go buy a magazine with articles without naked women in them. if your gonna buy a playboy buy it for the real reason. the boobies
|
|
|
|
Post by William on Nov 18, 2003 22:07:32 GMT -5
i was being sarcastic will. and yeh thats the whole point of that statement. when someone says yeh i just read it for the articles then go buy a magazine with articles without naked women in them. if your gonna buy a playboy buy it for the real reason. the boobies yeah...i got the sarcasm...i was just adding on to it...and yeah i tottaly agree...and how am i sick to say its useless to read playboy for the articles, i said you could, but its pointless... |
|
|
|
Post by TheSilentDemon on Nov 18, 2003 22:37:25 GMT -5
i wouldn't say its pointless. its just deniability
|
|
|
|
Post by Mark617 on Nov 18, 2003 22:44:04 GMT -5
the whole "i read playboy for the articles" is just a joke, nothing more. i dont think anyone tries use that as a valid excuse. though a certain someone may have used a similar excuse to explain his buying of "plumpers" and "over 40" magizines.....as for scott (or anyone for that matter) who says they think porn is wrong but have looked at it or still do, people get tempted and sometimes they submit to the temptation. shit happens
|
|
|
|
Post by scott on Nov 18, 2003 23:08:23 GMT -5
"plumpers" and "over 40" magizines... Soiled the board with that...ewwww... |
|
|
|
Post by leprechauneddie on Nov 19, 2003 17:20:58 GMT -5
Porn is wrong in all regards. The Chaun isn't playing saint again, like the Chaun did with Mysterious Person's avatar. But hey, that's a great example. Isn't that "soft porn" Scott? Look, the Chaun's likes the boobies as much as the next guy, but let's be decent and show the smallest semblance of restraint, huh?
And look Sarien, the Chaun doesn't know who you are, but if you know Scott then you probably DO have a shitty view of guys. HAHAHAHAHA... (ahem)... Anyway, not all of us are that twisted.
|
|
|
|
Post by William on Nov 19, 2003 18:26:25 GMT -5
yeah i deffinitely agree...i think its wrong, but i am not perfect...i have fallen to this...and struggle often not to...
|
|
